Clinically proven results
QAL-100™ the active complex in the SKIN.NY® Radical
cosmetic range has undergone extensive research and studies which prove it’s
effectiveness in reducing wrinkles and improving facial complexion.
The research work and findings have been published by the peer
review journal, The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD). The British Journal
of Dermatology publishes papers on all aspects of the biology and pathology
of the skin and is regarded as the most prestigious source of research information
for professional Dermatologists worldwide. When the BJD published the clinical
trial on SKIN.NY® with QAL-100™ it was the first time since it’s
inception in 1888 that the BJD has published research on a cosmetic cream.
Methods of treatment
The cosmetic and beauty market has, through the years, been characterized
by an immense choice of products and substances, most of which promise a positive
effect against age associated skin problems but, seldom deliver results. Prior
to QAL-100™ only creams containing retinoic acid have a proven physiological
effect. Unfortunately, retinoic acid causes strong adverse effects for most
users.
The clinical studies were conducted by Professor Beitner at the
prestigious Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden, home of the Nobel prize for medicine.
The studies, which consisted of four separate methods of evaluation, demonstrated
that SKIN.NY® with QAL-100™ contains skin revitalising qualities
similar to those found in retinoic acid but with the conclusive difference
that no adverse effects were noted.
Documentation
The duration of the clinical trial was twelve weeks. Two coded
tubes, marked right and left but otherwise identical, were given to the test
subjects. The contents of one tube, a cream base (placebo cream), was applied
to one half of the face. The contents of the other tube containing SKIN.NY® with
QAL-100™, was applied to the other half of the face. Neither the test
supervisor nor the test subjects knew which tube contained SKIN.NY® with
QAL-100™.
Four test methods were employed:
- Self evaluation
- Laser profilometry
- Clinical evaluation
- Photographic evaluation
|